Build a bespoke eval.
Tell us what outcomes you're looking for. We'll match you to a pilot configuration — or build a bespoke operator eval from scratch with you. Your people. Your workflows. Your evals. Your benchmarks.
Build a Bespoke Eval Run a 30-Day Operator EvalThree steps. No dashboard required.
30-minute call. We define your cohort, systems in scope, privacy boundaries, and the performance questions you need answered.
We match you to one of 12 commercial pilots — or build a bespoke eval configuration from 15 evaluation families. You get a saveable JSON config with governance metadata.
30-day pilot. CLI, TUI, and MCP throughout. Baseline → Benchmark → Diagnose → Intervene → Re-evaluate. Cohort-level reporting. No productivity scores.
Who should contact us.
| Role | When to reach out |
|---|---|
| Head of AI / Transformation | AI is deployed but operator performance is invisible. You need a baseline and benchmarks. |
| CIO / IT | Choosing between models or tools. You need an independent operator eval and model/operator fit analysis. |
| L&D / AI Enablement | You spent on training. You need to know if it changed operator performance — measured, not surveyed. |
| Operations / BU Leader | Teams are stuck. You need to know if the constraint is the operator, the tool, or the workflow. |
| Procurement | You're evaluating AI vendors. You need independent verification of operator quality. |
| AI Governance / Risk | You need operator evaluation that doesn't require prompt-content surveillance. |
Direct line.
Deric J. McHenry — Ello Cello LLC
MO§ES™ evaluates how operators perform. It does not claim that a higher metric score means a better employee, higher job performance, greater productivity, or better business outcomes without separate validation.